The Dialogue (19)

   I was suddenly asked to explain about the way of thinking, not as a means of electric connections in the brain. I thought it was a kind of interesting approach to ask something like that. Because I was once suspicious that the diffference among people was originated initially from the way of thinking. And I was eventually interested  in the idea of how to influence the way of thinking beyond a behavioral method. 

   But somewhere along the line, I lost my appetite to get into that field of those subject more deeply. Probably, I was out of curious questions to go further in some point. I was talking to myself that it's enough.

   Nowdays I prefer to stick to the way of thinking that it would be comfortable with me to be in the line of inferring from reasonality, based on and cultivated from own experiences. And I feel a little awkward to accept other's voice without my own filtering process. I don't mean they are wrong but I am against the statement that I am being explained and discovered by other's words by the name of empathy. 

   The change of subject was proceeded all of sudden.