A Difference Between Being and Becoming

The difference between what can be (being) and what should be done (becoming) is enormous. Its point on the emphasis on being challenges the possibility of being able to be and excludes an unconditional approach. However, its perspective in connection to becoming implies a coercive sense of being undonditional. A typical example of self-righteousness of doing all the way up until completion is shown frequently as a common ｅxpression.

I won't be able to figure out what I have unless I have gone enough, so it would be necessary to take the will. However, there are growing concerns over the undesirable consequences of going unconditionally in spite of any situation and circumstance as well. 

The approach of what can be (being) is accompanied with conformity in the situational logic, but the coercison of unconditional hope that ignores reality usually ends up with losing momentum by the opposing force that is cultivated by its own enemy. 

Hope seems to be undonditional in nature and something that must be realized for good. Thus, it tends to justify the logic that it should be carried out steadily although it is difficult at present. But if hope itself is based on the bleak and unrealistic recklessness, it is turned into tortue at some point.

So a skeptical view of what can be done is needed the most.