It would be a long time dilemma to recognize lots of differences among people. To me, I was asking for an answer that fulfills my own inquiry. It didn't have to be an universal truth per se. Rather, all I needed was something that I was persuaded and understood what would cause the differences the most. Becasue I knew I was not one whose consideration was so profound to capture every possible angles of other people. I tended to be ignorant in some ways and felt like living that way. I was asking the question why I should be bothered by the way I was living with.
The proximate explanation was not that far from where I stood. I was mostly persuaded by a theory of constancy of genes. It was too simple to acknowledge in the beginning. But along the line of exploring steps, I was gradually filled with gaining confidence on it. Mainly, it provided me with the premise and to develop the way that I could convince myself in the sensible cognition.
I know it is a two fold story that one is too conclusive and the other is lack of the surbordinate details. But I don't see anything clearer than far beyond this.
P.S. If I happen to wonder why he is acting like the way he does, I think I do know where I should go from that question.
'Story' 카테고리의 다른 글
Seeing Who I Was (0) | 2019.02.20 |
---|---|
Distributional Impacts (0) | 2019.02.19 |
Too Heavy to Handle With (0) | 2019.02.15 |
'A Crisis Isn't Over Yet?' (0) | 2019.02.14 |
Things about The Movies (0) | 2019.02.13 |