How History is Recorded

   It is based on what I presently see about what is going on around me and what if this incident will be explained in the eyes of others after 100 years later. I personally find it very stimulating to elaborate a little further. Because it gives me a rough picture of how history would have been recored.

 

1. once everthing is very likely to be described around the outcome.
(It is easy to be recorded as one of the determined facts in both positions, and in situations in which circumstances are missed. And it is likely to be recorded what consequences and effects have ultimately occurred as an outcome.)

2. It's more like a bird's eye view of give and take relations.
(One side claims the right in the sense that one is being hurt or damaged, and the other side weighs it, considering it's you or other relevant ones.)

3. Since the two sides are promoting understanding for mutual benefits, they have a great word to put together as cooperation.
(The relationship between interactions can not be ignored, so they are often concluded in the form of compromise.)

4. It is a movement for balance after all and the balance is destined to shake again in any direction over time.

(Nothing lasts forever.)

   So, back to the title, how will history be recored? Are they the exclusive property of the winner? Is it a reflection of the spirit of the times? Or is it a conversation with the past?

   Much remains unfinished questions.