It's occured to me frequently in these days that there are basically two types of people around. There are one who would assume the worst possible scenario in the beginning if something goes wrong, and eventually lead an conclusion from the worst. And on the other hand, there are the other people would take the best possible scenario at first, based on a hypothesis that everything would go right and then proceed an conclusion from the possible best.
Nobody appears to know what it would be right or wrong. Because nobody seems to predict what it would happen in future.
The next obvious question would be how I could minimize on an occurence possibility of failure in case something goes wrong. Of course, it contains all foreseeable damages as well and implies the best possible solution to minimize on the damage.
I hardly believe in a notion that is emphasized by those who are in favor of a pure optimistic analysis. Because they are seriously lacking of a contingency plan to activate when things don't go well. And I am sick and tired of listening repeatedly that it would be very good if things go well.
That does not mean that I'm not going to do anything at all, being afraid of failure. But a solid and comprehensive plan should be presented and reviewed to assess approximately what it would be happening.
'Story' 카테고리의 다른 글
Good Nature (0) | 2019.11.20 |
---|---|
Manifestation (to interpret) (0) | 2019.11.19 |
More Than Meets The Eye (0) | 2019.11.15 |
Life after A Certain Age (0) | 2019.11.14 |
A Story about Job Search (0) | 2019.11.13 |